Criminal Lab Grown Meat
Professor Michael Roberts of UCLA Law provides analysis on the recent laws criminalizing lab-grown meat production in Florida and Alabama. Roberts highlights the potential for conflict between state regulations and federal oversight managed by the USDA and FDA. Food technologies, like lab-grown meat have historically been used as political footballs, both within the U.S. and globally. Professor Roberts explains how the new state regs reflect a broader challenge within food law to balance innovation, public safety, and politics.
Key Discussion Points:
State-Level Bans:
-
Florida and Alabama Legislation: Both states have recently passed laws prohibiting the manufacture, sale, and distribution of lab-grown meat. Amost other things, these bans aim to protect traditional agriculture and address consumer safety concerns. Professor Roberts discusses the specifics of these laws, criticisms, and the legislative motivations behind them.
Federal Regulatory Framework:
-
USDA and FDA Collaboration: Professor Roberts provides insights into the joint regulatory framework established by the USDA and FDA for overseeing lab-grown meat. He explains the distinct roles of each agency in ensuring the safety and labeling of these products.
Historical Context and Legal Precedents:
-
Evolution of Food Law: The interview places the current bans within the historical context of food regulation in the United States. Professor Roberts traces the development of food law and the political forces that have shaped it, noting key moments and legal precedents from the battle over margarine to the GMO-labeling controversy.
Federalism and State vs. Federal Authority: The tension between state and federal authority in regulating food products is explored. Professor Roberts discusses the potential for legal challenges based on federal preemption principles and how state-level bans interact with federal regulations.
