Titanic Nonliability

An interview with Prof. Martin Davies
DOWNLOAD WRITTEN MATERIAL
35
 Share

In the realm of maritime law, ships possess a unique legal characteristic: their total liability in the event of an accident is generally limited to the value of the ship post-incident. This principle, which can seem as impenetrable as the sea itself, is navigated by Professor Martin Davies of Tulane Law School, a renowned expert in maritime law. Davies explains the legal history and justification, real world tragedies and the impact of this limitation, and the cases and opinions that have shaped the law. 

The cornerstone of this discussion is the historical precedent set by laws like the Limitation of Liability Act of 1851. This statute (and others like it around the world) establish that a shipowner's financial responsibility in the aftermath of a disaster, generally cannot exceed the post-accident value of the ship and its cargo. This limitation aims to protect shipowners from crippling financial losses, thereby encouraging maritime commerce, but it also raises questions about justice and compensation for victims.

A stark illustration of this principle can be seen in the case of the RMS Titanic, as discussed by Professor Davies. After the Titanic sank in 1912, the liability of its owners was capped at the value of the remaining lifeboats. This effectively meant that the victims' families could only claim compensation up to this meager sum, starkly highlighting the potential harshness of maritime liability limits.

Professor Davies explores how this framework impacts not just historical incidents but also modern maritime disasters. From the duck boat sinking in 2018 to the fire aboard the "Conception" in 2019, these tragic events test the limits of liability laws and challenge the balance between protecting maritime enterprises and ensuring fair compensation for victims.


  • Attorney CLE accreditation 

RELATED TALKS