God & Football after Bremerton

In the religious freedom case, Kennedy v. Bremerton School District (2022), the Supreme Court weighed in on the role of God in football in American public schools. Professor Sarah Barringer Gordon (UPenn Law) explains the case, its impact on the First Amendment's Establishment Clause separating church and state, and the unusual history of religion and football at the Supreme Court.

In Bremerton, the Court decided whether a public school football coach named Joseph Kennedy violated the Establishment Clause by prominently praying at midfield after games. The Court found in favor of the coach and determined that his actions were protected by the Free Speech and Free Exercise protections of the First Amendment.  Finally, Prof. Gordon explains the historical ebb and flow of Establishment Clause power and lays out the Court’s new test for evaluating potential violations of church and state after Kennedy v Bremerton.


  • Attorney CLE accreditation 

Additional Resources

KENNEDY v. BREMERTON

 

CASES DISCUSSED

  • Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971): Statutes that provide state funding for non-public, non-secular schools violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The Supreme Court established its three-part “Lemon Test” in this case. 
  • Carson v. Makin (2022): The Supreme Court ruled that Maine’s requirement that school tuition assistance payments only be used towards secular schools violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. 
  • Shurtleff v. Boston (2022): The Supreme Court ruled that the city government’s flag raising program does not constitute government speech, so the city was wrong in denying an application to raise a “Christian flag.”
  • Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969): The Supreme Court ruled that the wearing of armbands—in the form of protest—by students in public schools could not be prohibited, as First Amendment rights are not lost once a student steps onto school grounds. 
  • Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe (2000): The Supreme Court ruled that student-led prayer prior at football games violated the establishment clause of the First Amendment.
  • Locke v. Davey (2004): The Supreme Court ruled that Washington state could exclude non-secular majors with its scholarships without violating the Free Exercise clause. 
  • Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia Inc. v. Comer (2017): The Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional under the free exercise clause to exclude churches from an otherwise neutral secular aid program.  
  • Town of Greece v. Galloway (2014): The Supreme Court ruled that Christian prayer before a legislative meeting was not a violation of the Establishment Clause.

 

LAWS DISCUSSED

1st Amendment - “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

 

RELATED PAGES

The Lemon Test Explained – Prof. Sarah Gordon explains the three-part Lemon Test and whether it has been overturned by the Kennedy v. Bremerton case.  

Prof. John J. Donohue III discusses Analyzing Death - Race and Bias in Capital Punishment
Analyzing Death - Race and Bias in Capital Punishment
Prof. Darrell A. H. Miller discusses A Race to the 2nd Amendment
A Race to the 2nd Amendment
Prof. Douglas NeJaime discusses Assisted Reproduction and Parental Rights
Assisted Reproduction and Parental Rights
Prof. Dorit Reiss discusses COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates
COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates
Lee Rowland discusses Cyberbullying and the First Amendment
Cyberbullying and the First Amendment
Michelle A. Reed discusses Cyber Defense: Private Funds & Banks (Part 2)
Cyber Defense: Private Funds & Banks (Part 2)
Alexia Korberg discusses Dobbs v. Jackson, a Battleground for Abortion Rights
Dobbs v. Jackson, a Battleground for Abortion Rights
Prof. Kate Shaw discusses Donald Trump and the Weight of Presidential Speech
Donald Trump and the Weight of Presidential Speech
Prof. Nadine Strossen discusses Free Speech in a Social Media World
Free Speech in a Social Media World
Prof. Nadine Strossen discusses Free Speech vs Hate Speech on Campus
Free Speech vs Hate Speech on Campus
Prof. Richard Briffault discusses From Super PACs to Dark Money
From Super PACs to Dark Money
Prof. Richard Briffault discusses From Super PACs to Dark Money (Part 2)
From Super PACs to Dark Money (Part 2)
Prof. Samuel Issacharoff discusses Gerrymandering: The Art of Redrawing Elections
Gerrymandering: The Art of Redrawing Elections
Prof. Jeffrey Rosen discusses Government Surveillance: Privacy & Technology
Government Surveillance: Privacy & Technology
Prof. Joseph Blocher discusses Gun Rights under Rahimi & Cargill
Gun Rights under Rahimi & Cargill
Lee Rowland discusses Hate Speech in America
Hate Speech in America
Lee Rowland discusses Hate Speech in America (Part 2)
Hate Speech in America (Part 2)
Prof. Susan N. Herman discusses Individual Liberty in Post-9/11 America
Individual Liberty in Post-9/11 America
Prof. Stephen Vladeck discusses Inside the Shadow Docket
Inside the Shadow Docket
Phillip Miller discusses Jailhouse Law—Lawyering as an Inmate
Jailhouse Law—Lawyering as an Inmate
Phillip Miller discusses Jailhouse Law—Lawyering from Inside Prison
Jailhouse Law—Lawyering from Inside Prison
Prof. Richard H. Fallon, Jr. discusses Justice Forever – Life Tenure
Justice Forever – Life Tenure
Prof. Richard H. Fallon, Jr. discusses Justice Forever – Life Tenure  (Part 2)
Justice Forever – Life Tenure (Part 2)
Judge Andrew Napolitano discusses Mass Quarantines in the COVID-19 Crisis
Mass Quarantines in the COVID-19 Crisis
Prof. John J. Donohue III discusses Mass Shootings and Gun Laws
Mass Shootings and Gun Laws
Prof. John J. Donohue III discusses Mass Shootings and Gun Laws (Part 2)
Mass Shootings and Gun Laws (Part 2)
Prof. Emily Murphy discusses Memory Evidence (Part 2)
Memory Evidence (Part 2)
john a. powell discusses Modern Discrimination, Race & Inequality
Modern Discrimination, Race & Inequality
Prof. Rachel Harmon discusses Police Commands & Police Coercion
Police Commands & Police Coercion
Prof. Daniel Capra discusses Police Power and Personal Rights
Police Power and Personal Rights
Prof. Daniel Capra discusses Police Power and Personal Rights (Part 2)
Police Power and Personal Rights (Part 2)
Prof. Rachel Harmon discusses Policing the Police (Part 2)
Policing the Police (Part 2)
Prof. Joel Reidenberg discusses Privacy & Technology in Today's Schools
Privacy & Technology in Today's Schools
Prof. Jeffrey Rosen discusses Privacy vs. Government Tech
Privacy vs. Government Tech
Alicia Bannon discusses Recusal & the Bounds of Judicial Bias
Recusal & the Bounds of Judicial Bias
Professor Jody Madeira discusses Red Flag Laws & Domestic Violence Orders
Red Flag Laws & Domestic Violence Orders
Prof. John J. Donohue III discusses Regulating Guns: Smart Laws & Dumb Laws
Regulating Guns: Smart Laws & Dumb Laws
Prof. John J. Donohue III discusses Regulating Guns: Smart Laws & Dumb Laws (Part 2)
Regulating Guns: Smart Laws & Dumb Laws (Part 2)
Judge Andrew Napolitano discusses Replacing Scalia - Filling a Vacancy on the Supreme Court
Replacing Scalia - Filling a Vacancy on the Supreme Court
Judge Andrew Napolitano discusses SCOTUS 2016 - A Year without a Justice
SCOTUS 2016 - A Year without a Justice
Profs Adam Cox and Cristina Rodriguez discusses Shadow Immigration and the Power of the Presidency
Shadow Immigration and the Power of the Presidency
Profs Adam Cox and Cristina Rodriguez discusses Shadow Immigration and the Power of the Presidency (Part 2)
Shadow Immigration and the Power of the Presidency (Part 2)
Judge Andrew Napolitano discusses State-Sanctioned Targeted Killing
State-Sanctioned Targeted Killing
Prof. Dorit Reiss discusses The COVID-19 Vaccine and the Role of the State
The COVID-19 Vaccine and the Role of the State
Prof. Eric Goldman discusses The Law of Deplatforming
The Law of Deplatforming
Joel Cohen discusses The Leaked Opinion, Dobbs v. Jackson
The Leaked Opinion, Dobbs v. Jackson
Seymour James discusses The Right to an Attorney - Currently Under Threat
The Right to an Attorney - Currently Under Threat
Prof. Richard Pildes discusses The Shifting Power of Political Parties
The Shifting Power of Political Parties
Prof. Richard Pildes discusses The Shifting Power of Political Parties (Part 2)
The Shifting Power of Political Parties (Part 2)
Prof. Theodore M. Shaw discusses Understanding SFFA v. Harvard
Understanding SFFA v. Harvard
Prof. Dorit Reiss discusses Vaccine Mandates for Children
Vaccine Mandates for Children
Columbia Law School Faculty discusses Vulnerable Populations in a Pandemic
Vulnerable Populations in a Pandemic
Prof. Marci Hamilton discusses When Religious Freedom Harms Children
When Religious Freedom Harms Children
Prof. Marci Hamilton discusses When Religious Freedom Harms Children (Part 2)
When Religious Freedom Harms Children (Part 2)
Prof. Lisa Heinzerling discusses WV v. EPA and the Major Questions Doctrine
WV v. EPA and the Major Questions Doctrine