The Law of Deplatforming
68 min
Share

The Law of Deplatforming

An interview with Prof. Eric Goldman

CLE Credit
CA ›· General
1 cr
NY ›· Areas of Professional Practice
1 cr

Social media platforms have become integral to the way we not only interact with friends, but also, how we connect with businesses, schools, and political candidates.  So, with so much social, political, and economic activity happening on social platforms, what rights, if any, do individuals have to access particular social media platforms.  In this interview, we discuss "deplatforming" and individual rights with Professor Eric Goldman. 

Prof. Goldman shares results from his study of civil cases and breaks down the legal arguments that plaintiffs, banned from social media, have made against the likes of Twitter and Facebook. Generally, courts have widely rejected plaintiff claims that range from First Amendment free speech arguments, to common carrier obligations, to anti-discrimination, to breach of contract claims.  Professor Goldman explores and evaluates deplatforming lawsuits under each type of claim and how courts have responded.  Finally, Goldman goes to the cutting edge of internet law and evaluates controversial new state laws that attempt to impose obligations on internet companies such as “must-carry” and “digital due process” requirements and shares insights on how appellate courts are treating such laws to date.  

About Prof. Eric Goldman

“One of the risks is that copyright laws are actually proliferating the differences in emojis in a way that ultimately might make it harder for us to communicate with each other.”
Eric Goldman is Associate Dean for Research and Professor of Law at Santa Clara University School of Law, where he co-directs the Datta Center for High Tech Law (formerly the High Tech Law Institute) and co-supervises the school's Privacy Law Certificate. His research and teaching focus on internet law, intellectual property, privacy, and advertising and marketing law, and his article "Emojis and the Law" (Washington Law Review, 2018) is a leading study of how courts treat emoji. He is the author of an Internet Law casebook and co-author of an Advertising & Marketing Law casebook, and he writes the long-running Technology & Marketing Law Blog, an inductee of the ABA Journal's Blawg Hall of Fame. Santa Clara University honored him with its Award for Sustained Excellence in Scholarship. Before entering academia, he practiced internet law at Cooley Godward in Silicon Valley and served as general counsel of Epinions.com.